CAFC affirms ND Ca in Aptix/Mohsen case
In a case involving California state law, note the dissent of Judge Newman.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:44 PM
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- SD Ill reversed by CAFC in Prima Tek v Poly Pap
- Claims of 4 of 5 NTP patents in NTP/RIM dispute re...
- Techcentral on patent reform
- More discussion of Microsoft's 6,898,604 on XML se...
- Aftermath of Purdue Pharma patent loss on OxyContin
- Star Scientific v R.J. Reynolds
- Biden run for president?
- "Patents don't really matter"
- Patent search strategies on USPTO database
- News ranking: veracity of internet searches
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home