Attorney argument issue in Ex parte Willauer
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 4:25 AM
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Appellant does win a missing element argument in E...
- Appellant wins "missing element" case in Ex parte ...
- Appellant wins "missing element" case in Ex parte ...
- Ocean Tomo and Patent Rankings
- Appellant wins at PTAB on missing element case
- Appellant loses in Ex parte Hartwig
- Patent holder loses in appeal of Inter partes Reex...
- NCube (ARRIS) v. Seachange
- Ex parte Pedlow illustrates the need to file prope...
- CAFC discusses inequitable conduct in INTELLECT WI...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home